<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DRBD 8.0.6 brings full live migration for Xen on DRBD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fghaas.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/drbd-806-brings-full-live-migration-for-xen-on-drbd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fghaas.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/drbd-806-brings-full-live-migration-for-xen-on-drbd/</link>
	<description>Linux, DRBD, and other stuff of interest</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: blog.bitingbytes.de &#187; Xen Live Migration ohne Cluster-Filesystem oder NFS</title>
		<link>http://fghaas.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/drbd-806-brings-full-live-migration-for-xen-on-drbd/#comment-1796</link>
		<dc:creator>blog.bitingbytes.de &#187; Xen Live Migration ohne Cluster-Filesystem oder NFS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fghaas.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/drbd-806-brings-full-live-migration-for-xen-on-drbd/#comment-1796</guid>
		<description>[...] DRBD 8.0.6 brings full live migration for Xen on DRBD http://fghaas.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/drbd-806-brings-full-live-migration-for-xen-on-drbd/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DRBD 8.0.6 brings full live migration for Xen on DRBD <a href="http://fghaas.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/drbd-806-brings-full-live-migration-for-xen-on-drbd/" rel="nofollow">http://fghaas.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/drbd-806-brings-full-live-migration-for-xen-on-drbd/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian Haas</title>
		<link>http://fghaas.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/drbd-806-brings-full-live-migration-for-xen-on-drbd/#comment-1408</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian Haas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fghaas.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/drbd-806-brings-full-live-migration-for-xen-on-drbd/#comment-1408</guid>
		<description>Marco,

yes you can use LVM snapshots with DRBD, however it's advisable to make sure that the file system is "frozen" at the time the snapshot is created. That's not too easily feasible when using DRBD as Xen VBDs. YMMV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marco,</p>
<p>yes you can use LVM snapshots with DRBD, however it&#8217;s advisable to make sure that the file system is &#8220;frozen&#8221; at the time the snapshot is created. That&#8217;s not too easily feasible when using DRBD as Xen VBDs. YMMV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco Barbero</title>
		<link>http://fghaas.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/drbd-806-brings-full-live-migration-for-xen-on-drbd/#comment-1368</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Barbero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 01:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fghaas.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/drbd-806-brings-full-live-migration-for-xen-on-drbd/#comment-1368</guid>
		<description>Can I use DRBD 8 on top of LVM, so that I can take advantage of LVM snapshot for backup purpose? Or is there an alternative way to accomplish this?
Thanks in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I use DRBD 8 on top of LVM, so that I can take advantage of LVM snapshot for backup purpose? Or is there an alternative way to accomplish this?<br />
Thanks in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian Haas</title>
		<link>http://fghaas.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/drbd-806-brings-full-live-migration-for-xen-on-drbd/#comment-1366</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian Haas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 21:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fghaas.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/drbd-806-brings-full-live-migration-for-xen-on-drbd/#comment-1366</guid>
		<description>"Q",

this does not require GFS. Nor OCFS2. Indeed, the point is to avoid the need for a clustering file system. 

The helper script makes your VBDs Primary on domU creation, and Secondary on domU destruction. The allow-to-primaries option is there to allow live migration, since Xen assumes to have write access to the backing both the source and the destination host at the time of migration. If you're not using live migration, you can do fine without allow-two-primaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Q&#8221;,</p>
<p>this does not require GFS. Nor OCFS2. Indeed, the point is to avoid the need for a clustering file system. </p>
<p>The helper script makes your VBDs Primary on domU creation, and Secondary on domU destruction. The allow-to-primaries option is there to allow live migration, since Xen assumes to have write access to the backing both the source and the destination host at the time of migration. If you&#8217;re not using live migration, you can do fine without allow-two-primaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q</title>
		<link>http://fghaas.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/drbd-806-brings-full-live-migration-for-xen-on-drbd/#comment-1297</link>
		<dc:creator>Q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fghaas.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/drbd-806-brings-full-live-migration-for-xen-on-drbd/#comment-1297</guid>
		<description>Does this setup require GFS or other clustering filesystem and all the fencing stuff for live migration? or does it somehow handle it so that the source vm blocks writes/goes secondary when the destination vm becomes primary? at least allow-two-primaries is enabled so i guess gfs is needed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this setup require GFS or other clustering filesystem and all the fencing stuff for live migration? or does it somehow handle it so that the source vm blocks writes/goes secondary when the destination vm becomes primary? at least allow-two-primaries is enabled so i guess gfs is needed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian Haas</title>
		<link>http://fghaas.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/drbd-806-brings-full-live-migration-for-xen-on-drbd/#comment-505</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian Haas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fghaas.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/drbd-806-brings-full-live-migration-for-xen-on-drbd/#comment-505</guid>
		<description>Maxim,

Re question #1: the maximum number of device nodes DRBD can handle is 255 -- 32 by default, and up to 255 if you set the minor_count module parameter for the drbd.ko kernel module. I am not sure if there is a lower limit on VBDs per domU in Xen, though.

Re question #2: both internal and external meta data is fine with DRBD. If you can place the meta data on a different spindle than the rest of your data, you might gain a slight performance benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maxim,</p>
<p>Re question #1: the maximum number of device nodes DRBD can handle is 255 &#8212; 32 by default, and up to 255 if you set the minor_count module parameter for the drbd.ko kernel module. I am not sure if there is a lower limit on VBDs per domU in Xen, though.</p>
<p>Re question #2: both internal and external meta data is fine with DRBD. If you can place the meta data on a different spindle than the rest of your data, you might gain a slight performance benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxim Doucet</title>
		<link>http://fghaas.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/drbd-806-brings-full-live-migration-for-xen-on-drbd/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxim Doucet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fghaas.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/drbd-806-brings-full-live-migration-for-xen-on-drbd/#comment-495</guid>
		<description>With this setup, there is one DRBD resource for each domU.
I was wondering :
 - is there a limitation of the number of DRBD resources that can be handled ?
 - can each resource's meta-data be safely stored within it or is it better to have an external meta-disk partition ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With this setup, there is one DRBD resource for each domU.<br />
I was wondering :<br />
 - is there a limitation of the number of DRBD resources that can be handled ?<br />
 - can each resource&#8217;s meta-data be safely stored within it or is it better to have an external meta-disk partition ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
